June 2025 - Athletic teams have long been separated by male and female in order to foster safety, fairness, and athletic opportunities for women and girls. While sex distinctions were generally prohibited under Title IX, these reasonable sex-based distinctions were permitted, even required, in order to carry out Title IX’s purpose of creating educational and athletic opportunities on the basis of…
Read More
April 2025 - We show respect for the dignity of all people by providing separate space for males and females in instances where privacy between the two sexes is relevant, such as in restrooms, showers, locker rooms, and overnight accommodations like dorm rooms and hotel rooms on school trips. The distinctions between the two sexes is the reason our society has had separate locker rooms, showers, and…
Read More
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services. The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should…
Read More
Summary In 2018, the South Carolina Department of Health & Human Services determined that the state’s abortion providers were unqualified to receive state Medicaid funding. Planned Parenthood and Julie Edwards, a state resident demanding to use Medicaid services at Planned Parenthood, sued arguing that states should not be permitted to disqualify abortion providers. While the…
Read More
In 2023, lawmakers in both Tennessee and Kentucky passed into state law protections for children from harmful medical experiments involving puberty blocking drugs and irreversible sexual cosmetic surgeries. “The last decade has seen a marked international shift away from medicalized “transition”—i.e. the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures—for minors with…
Read More
This case challenges a rule adopted by the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board on the grounds that the rule, Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(g), controls how attorneys who practice in Pennsylvania may speak on issues including sexual orientation and gender identity or expression. This new rule, which infringes on attorneys’ First Amendment rights to free speech, applies special nondiscriminatory…
Read More