A fifth-grade student’s invitations to a church Christmas party were singled out and prohibited even though other student invitations were permitted.
One would have thought that this issue could have been worked out once the Pocono Mountain School District’s administration was made aware of the selective censoring of a student’s speech. However, in K.A. v. Pocono Mountain School District, the school district argued before the District Court and again at the Court of Appeals that its policy was constitutional. The Court of Appeals disagreed, finding that the school district and its policies unconstitutionally suppressed student expression.
